TSTP Solution File: ITP002^3 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : ITP002^3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:29:45 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 2.97s 0.83s
% Output : Refutation 2.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : ITP002^3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.03/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat May 18 16:38:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.37 This is a TH1_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.14/0.37 Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.39 % (1980)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1981)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1975)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1976)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1977)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1978)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1974)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1981)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.39 % (1981)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1981)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1981)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.39 % (1981)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (1981)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.22/0.39 % (1981)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (1981)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1981)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1981)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1979)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1977)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.39 % (1977)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1977)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1977)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.39 % (1977)Termination phase: Preprocessing 1
% 0.22/0.39 % (1978)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.39 % (1978)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1978)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (1978)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.39 % (1978)Termination phase: shuffling
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (1978)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.22/0.39 % (1978)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (1978)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1978)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1978)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1977)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.22/0.39 % (1977)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (1977)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1977)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1977)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1975)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.39 % (1975)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1975)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1975)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.39 % (1975)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (1975)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.22/0.39 % (1975)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (1975)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1975)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1975)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1979)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.39 % (1979)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1979)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1979)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 % (1979)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.39 % (1979)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.39 % (1979)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.22/0.39 % (1979)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39 % (1979)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.40 % (1980)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.40 % (1980)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.40 % (1980)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.40 % (1980)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.40 % (1980)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.40
% 0.22/0.40 % (1980)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.22/0.40 % (1980)Time elapsed: 0.012 s
% 0.22/0.40 % (1980)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.22/0.40 % (1980)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.40 % (1980)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.40 % (1984)dis+21_1:1_cbe=off:cnfonf=off:fs=off:fsr=off:hud=1:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.22/0.40 % (1982)lrs+1002_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:hud=14:prag=on:sp=weighted_frequency:tnu=1:i=37:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.22/0.40 % (1985)lrs+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_gen:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=4203469,65536:i=1041:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/1041Mi)
% 0.22/0.40 % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.40 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 0.22/0.41 % (1983)lrs+2_16:1_acc=model:au=on:bd=off:c=on:e2e=on:nm=2:sos=all:i=15:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/15Mi)
% 0.22/0.41 % (1984)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.41 % (1984)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.41 % (1984)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.41 % (1984)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.41 % (1984)Termination phase: Preprocessing 3
% 0.22/0.41
% 0.22/0.41 % (1984)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.22/0.41 % (1984)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.41 % (1984)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.22/0.41 % (1984)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.41 % (1984)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.41 % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.41 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 0.22/0.41 % (1976)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.41 % (1976)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.41 % (1976)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.41 % (1976)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.41 % (1976)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.41
% 0.22/0.41 % (1976)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.22/0.41 % (1976)Time elapsed: 0.022 s
% 0.22/0.41 % (1976)Instructions burned: 27 (million)
% 0.22/0.41 % (1976)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.41 % (1976)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.41 % (1986)lrs+10_1:1_av=off:chr=on:plsq=on:slsq=on:i=7:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.22/0.41 % (1983)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.41 % (1983)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.41 % (1983)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.41 % (1983)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.41
% 0.22/0.41
% 0.22/0.41 % (1983)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.22/0.41 % (1983)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.41 % (1983)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.22/0.41 % (1983)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.41 % (1983)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.41 % (1987)lrs+10_1:1_acc=on:amm=sco:cs=on:tgt=full:i=16:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/16Mi)
% 0.22/0.41 % (1986)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.41 % (1986)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.41 % (1986)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.41 % (1986)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.41 % (1986)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.41
% 0.22/0.41 % (1986)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.22/0.41 % (1986)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.41 % (1986)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.22/0.41 % (1986)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.41 % (1986)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.42 % (1988)lrs+21_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=off:fd=preordered:fe=off:fsr=off:hud=11:inj=on:kws=precedence:s2pl=no:sp=weighted_frequency:tgt=full:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.22/0.42 % (1987)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.42 % (1987)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.42 % (1987)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.42 % (1987)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.42 % (1987)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.42
% 0.22/0.42 % (1987)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.22/0.42 % (1987)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.42 % (1987)Instructions burned: 16 (million)
% 0.22/0.42 % (1987)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.42 % (1987)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.42 % (1989)lrs+2_1:1_apa=on:au=on:bd=preordered:cnfonf=off:cs=on:ixr=off:sos=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.22/0.42 % (1990)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=off:cs=on:hud=3:prag=on:sup=off:i=7:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.22/0.42 % (1988)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.42 % (1988)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.42 % (1988)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.42 % (1988)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.42 % (1988)Termination phase: Preprocessing 3
% 0.22/0.42
% 0.22/0.42 % (1988)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.22/0.42 % (1988)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.42 % (1988)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.22/0.42 % (1988)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.42 % (1988)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.42 % (1989)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.42 % (1989)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.42 % (1989)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.42 % (1989)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.42 % (1989)Termination phase: Property scanning
% 0.22/0.42
% 0.22/0.42 % (1989)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.22/0.42 % (1989)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.42 % (1989)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.22/0.42 % (1989)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.42 % (1989)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.42 % (1991)dis+1002_1:1_add=large:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:prag=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.22/0.42 % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.42 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 0.22/0.43 % (1990)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.43 % (1990)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.43 % (1990)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.43 % (1990)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.43 % (1990)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.43
% 0.22/0.43 % (1990)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.43 % (1990)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.43 % (1990)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.22/0.43 % (1990)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.43 % (1990)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.43 % (1992)dis+1004_1:1_cha=on:cs=on:fe=off:hud=1:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.22/0.43 % (1992)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.43 % (1992)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.43 % (1992)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.43 % (1992)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.43 % (1992)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.43
% 0.22/0.43 % (1992)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.22/0.43 % (1992)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.43 % (1992)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.22/0.43 % (1992)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.43 % (1992)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.43 % (1994)lrs+10_1:1_e2e=on:sd=1:sgt=8:ss=axioms:i=710:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/710Mi)
% 0.22/0.43 % (1993)lrs+1002_1:1_anc=all_dependent:au=on:cbe=off:fde=unused:ntd=on:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.22/0.44 % (1996)dis+1002_5:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:fde=none:fs=off:fsr=off:sos=on:i=902:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/902Mi)
% 0.22/0.44 % (1995)lrs+1004_1:1_chr=on:prag=on:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.22/0.44 % (1993)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.44 % (1993)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.44 % (1993)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.44 % (1993)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.44 % (1993)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44 % (1993)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.22/0.44 % (1993)Time elapsed: 0.009 s
% 0.22/0.44 % (1993)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
% 0.22/0.44 % (1993)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.44 % (1993)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.44 % (1998)dis+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:i=5:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/5Mi)
% 0.22/0.44 % (1996)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.44 % (1996)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.44 % (1996)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.44 % (1996)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44 % (1996)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.22/0.44 % (1996)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.22/0.44 % (1996)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.22/0.44 % (1996)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.44 % (1996)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.44 % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.44 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 0.22/0.44 % (1995)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.44 % (1995)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.44 % (1995)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.44 % (1995)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.44 % (1995)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.44
% 0.22/0.44 % (1995)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.44 % (1995)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.22/0.44 % (1995)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.22/0.44 % (1995)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.44 % (1995)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.45 % (2000)lrs+1002_1:128_au=on:c=on:fsr=off:piset=equals:i=377:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/377Mi)
% 0.22/0.45 % (1997)dis+21_1:8_apa=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:fsr=off:hud=0:ins=1:kws=inv_frequency:nwc=10.0:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=21:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/21Mi)
% 0.22/0.45 % (1999)lrs+2_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:cs=on:fe=off:hud=10:inj=on:ins=3:plsq=on:plsqc=1:sd=10:ss=axioms:tnu=1:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.22/0.46 % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.46 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 0.22/0.46 % (2001)dis+1010_1:4_atotf=0.2:c=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_simp:fe=off:ins=2:ntd=on:s2a=on:s2at=5.0:sgt=5:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=779:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/779Mi)
% 0.22/0.46 % (2002)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_be_gen:ntd=on:sp=const_min:ss=axioms:sup=off:i=19:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/19Mi)
% 0.22/0.46 % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.46 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 0.22/0.46 % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.46 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 0.22/0.46 % (1997)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.46 % (1997)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.46 % (1997)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.46 % (1997)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.46 % (1997)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.46
% 0.22/0.46 % (1997)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.22/0.46 % (1997)Time elapsed: 0.044 s
% 0.22/0.46 % (1997)Instructions burned: 21 (million)
% 0.22/0.46 % (1997)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.46 % (1997)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.47 % (2003)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:sd=1:sgt=50:ss=axioms:i=879:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/879Mi)
% 0.22/0.47 % (2004)dis+1002_1:128_acc=on:er=filter:i=17:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/17Mi)
% 0.22/0.47 % (2006)lrs+1010_1:8_cnfonf=off:hud=1:inj=on:tnu=5:i=30:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/30Mi)
% 0.22/0.48 % (2007)dis+10_1:1_ixr=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:s2a=on:i=127:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/127Mi)
% 0.22/0.48 % (2005)ott+21_1:1_apa=on:au=on:cnfonf=off:sos=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.22/0.48 % (2004)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.48 % (2004)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.48 % (2004)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.48 % (2004)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.48 % (2004)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.48
% 0.22/0.48 % (2004)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.22/0.48 % (2004)Time elapsed: 0.013 s
% 0.22/0.48 % (2004)Instructions burned: 17 (million)
% 0.22/0.48 % (2004)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.48 % (2004)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.48 % (2005)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.48 % (2005)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.48 % (2005)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.48 % (2005)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.48 % (2005)Termination phase: Preprocessing 3
% 0.22/0.48
% 0.22/0.48 % (2005)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.22/0.48 % (2005)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.48 % (2005)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.22/0.48 % (2005)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.48 % (2005)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.49 % (2006)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.49 % (2006)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.49 % (2006)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.49 % (2006)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.49 % (2006)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 % (2006)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.22/0.49 % (2006)Time elapsed: 0.022 s
% 0.22/0.49 % (2006)Instructions burned: 30 (million)
% 0.22/0.49 % (2006)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.49 % (2006)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.50 % (2008)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=conj_eager:cond=on:hi=on:i=100:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.22/0.50 % (2009)dis+10_1:1_anc=none:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fd=preordered:fe=off:hud=10:ins=3:ixr=off:nwc=5.0:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:sp=const_frequency:uhcvi=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.22/0.50 % (1974)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.50 % (1974)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.50 % (1974)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.50 % (1974)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.50 % (1974)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.50
% 0.22/0.50 % (1974)Memory used [KB]: 6652
% 0.22/0.50 % (1974)Time elapsed: 0.116 s
% 0.22/0.50 % (1974)Instructions burned: 184 (million)
% 0.22/0.50 % (1974)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.50 % (1974)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.50 % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.50 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 0.22/0.50 % (2010)lrs+10_8:1_au=on:avsq=on:e2e=on:ins=3:s2a=on:s2at=3.0:ss=axioms:i=20:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/20Mi)
% 0.22/0.51 % (2010)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.51 % (2010)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51 % (2010)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.51 % (2010)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.51 % (2010)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.51
% 0.22/0.51 % (2010)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.22/0.51 % (2010)Time elapsed: 0.031 s
% 0.22/0.51 % (2010)Instructions burned: 21 (million)
% 0.22/0.51 % (2010)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51 % (2010)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.51 % (2012)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:nm=2:ntd=on:sd=2:ss=axioms:st=5.0:i=107:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/107Mi)
% 0.22/0.52 % (2011)dis+1002_1:1_cbe=off:hud=5:nm=4:plsq=on:plsqr=7,1:prag=on:sp=const_max:tnu=1:i=86:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/86Mi)
% 0.22/0.52 % (2013)lrs+2_1:1024_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:hud=15:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:i=39:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/39Mi)
% 0.22/0.52 % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.52 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 0.22/0.53 % (2014)dis+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_not_gen:fsr=off:kws=precedence:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=448:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/448Mi)
% 0.22/0.53 % Exception at run slice level
% 0.22/0.53 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 1.35/0.53 % (2008)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.35/0.53 % (2008)------------------------------
% 1.35/0.53 % (2008)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.35/0.53 % (2008)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.35/0.53 % (2008)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.35/0.53
% 1.35/0.53 % (2008)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 1.35/0.53 % (2008)Time elapsed: 0.061 s
% 1.35/0.53 % (2008)Instructions burned: 101 (million)
% 1.35/0.53 % (2008)------------------------------
% 1.35/0.53 % (2008)------------------------------
% 1.35/0.54 % (2007)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.35/0.54 % (2007)------------------------------
% 1.35/0.54 % (2007)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.35/0.54 % (2007)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.35/0.54 % (2007)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.35/0.54
% 1.35/0.54 % (2007)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 1.35/0.54 % (2007)Time elapsed: 0.062 s
% 1.35/0.54 % (2007)Instructions burned: 129 (million)
% 1.35/0.54 % (2007)------------------------------
% 1.35/0.54 % (2007)------------------------------
% 1.35/0.54 % (2015)lrs+10_1:512_au=on:fde=unused:lma=on:nm=32:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=16121663,131072:sfv=off:sp=const_max:ss=axioms:st=3.0:tgt=full:i=46:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/46Mi)
% 1.35/0.54 % (2016)lrs+10_1:10_au=on:av=off:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:ntd=on:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:i=98:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/98Mi)
% 1.35/0.54 % Exception at run slice level
% 1.35/0.54 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 1.35/0.55 % (2017)ott+1002_1:1_apa=on:au=on:bd=off:cnfonf=off:fd=off:sos=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=507:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/507Mi)
% 1.49/0.55 % (2017)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.49/0.55 % (2017)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.55 % (2017)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.49/0.55 % (2017)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.49/0.55
% 1.49/0.55
% 1.49/0.55 % (2017)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.49/0.55 % (2017)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.49/0.55 % (2017)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 1.49/0.55 % (2017)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.55 % (2017)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.55 % (2018)dis+1010_2:3_amm=off:fd=preordered:ixr=off:nm=0:pe=on:piset=equals:prag=on:sac=on:tgt=ground:i=149:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/149Mi)
% 1.49/0.56 % (2015)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.49/0.56 % (2015)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.56 % (2015)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.49/0.56 % (2015)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.49/0.56 % (2015)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.49/0.56
% 1.49/0.56 % (2015)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 1.49/0.56 % (2015)Time elapsed: 0.047 s
% 1.49/0.56 % (2015)Instructions burned: 47 (million)
% 1.49/0.56 % (2015)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.56 % (2015)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.56 % (2019)lrs+21_1:16_au=on:bd=off:piset=and:i=39:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/39Mi)
% 1.49/0.56 % (2011)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.49/0.56 % (2011)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.56 % (2011)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.49/0.56 % (2011)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.49/0.56 % (2011)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.49/0.56
% 1.49/0.56 % (2011)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 1.49/0.56 % (2011)Time elapsed: 0.074 s
% 1.49/0.56 % (2011)Instructions burned: 86 (million)
% 1.49/0.56 % (2011)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.56 % (2011)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.56 % (2012)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.49/0.56 % (2012)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.56 % (2012)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.49/0.56 % (2012)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.49/0.56 % (2012)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.49/0.56
% 1.49/0.56 % (2012)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 1.49/0.56 % (2012)Time elapsed: 0.067 s
% 1.49/0.56 % (2012)Instructions burned: 109 (million)
% 1.49/0.56 % (2012)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.56 % (2012)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.57 % (2020)lrs+1004_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:fe=off:gs=on:hud=10:prag=on:tnu=1:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/6Mi)
% 1.49/0.57 % Exception at run slice level
% 1.49/0.57 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 1.49/0.57 % (2022)dis+10_1:1_aac=none:cs=on:i=47:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/47Mi)
% 1.49/0.58 % (2019)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.49/0.58 % (2019)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.58 % (2019)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.49/0.58 % (2019)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.49/0.58 % (2019)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.49/0.58
% 1.49/0.58 % (2019)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 1.49/0.58 % (2019)Time elapsed: 0.017 s
% 1.49/0.58 % (2019)Instructions burned: 39 (million)
% 1.49/0.58 % (2019)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.58 % (2019)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.58 % (2023)lrs+1010_1:128_av=off:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_simp:fsr=off:ntd=on:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=44:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/44Mi)
% 1.49/0.58 % (2000)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.49/0.58 % (2000)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.58 % (2000)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.49/0.58 % Exception at run slice level
% 1.49/0.58 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 1.49/0.58 % (2000)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.49/0.58 % (2000)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.49/0.58
% 1.49/0.58 % (2000)Memory used [KB]: 6396
% 1.49/0.58 % (2000)Time elapsed: 0.134 s
% 1.49/0.58 % (2000)Instructions burned: 378 (million)
% 1.49/0.58 % (2000)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.58 % (2000)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.58 % (2021)dis+1002_1:1_aac=none:au=on:e2e=on:nm=2:nwc=10.0:sd=1:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=1087:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2998ds/1087Mi)
% 1.49/0.59 % (2025)lrs+10_7:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:nwc=5.0:plsq=on:i=62:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/62Mi)
% 1.49/0.59 % (2024)dis+10_1:1_av=off:bd=off:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fe=off:hud=10:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:prag=on:tnu=1:i=432:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/432Mi)
% 1.49/0.59 % Exception at run slice level
% 1.49/0.59 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 1.49/0.59 % Exception at run slice level
% 1.49/0.59 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 1.49/0.59 % (2026)lrs+1010_1:16_add=large:amm=off:anc=all_dependent:chr=on:fd=off:ins=2:sp=const_max:tnu=5:uhcvi=on:i=31:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/31Mi)
% 1.49/0.60 % (2022)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.49/0.60 % (2022)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.60 % (2022)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.49/0.60 % (2022)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.49/0.60 % (2022)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.49/0.60
% 1.49/0.60 % (2022)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 1.49/0.60 % (2022)Time elapsed: 0.022 s
% 1.49/0.60 % (2022)Instructions burned: 49 (million)
% 1.49/0.60 % (2022)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.60 % (2022)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.60 % (2028)lrs+1002_1:4_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_pi_sigma_gen:hud=15:inj=on:nwc=4.0:s2a=on:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity:i=453:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/453Mi)
% 1.49/0.60 % (2027)dis+10_1:128_hud=1:i=96:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/96Mi)
% 1.49/0.60 % Exception at run slice level
% 1.49/0.60 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 1.49/0.60 % (2026)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.49/0.60 % (2026)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.60 % (2026)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.49/0.60 % (2026)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.49/0.60 % (2026)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.49/0.60
% 1.49/0.60 % (2026)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 1.49/0.60 % (2026)Time elapsed: 0.014 s
% 1.49/0.60 % (2026)Instructions burned: 32 (million)
% 1.49/0.60 % (2026)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.60 % (2026)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.60 % (2029)lrs-1004_1:1_au=on:bsd=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=off:fe=axiom:fsd=on:i=71:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/71Mi)
% 1.49/0.61 % (2030)dis+1002_1:1_bd=off:fsr=off:ntd=on:s2a=on:ss=axioms:i=83:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/83Mi)
% 1.49/0.61 % (2031)lrs+10_1:128_cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:hud=1:ins=1:i=11:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/11Mi)
% 1.49/0.61 % Exception at run slice level
% 1.49/0.61 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 1.49/0.61 % (2018)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.49/0.61 % (2018)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.61 % (2018)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.49/0.61 % (2018)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.49/0.61 % (2018)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.49/0.61
% 1.49/0.61 % (2018)Memory used [KB]: 6524
% 1.49/0.61 % (2018)Time elapsed: 0.063 s
% 1.49/0.61 % (2018)Instructions burned: 149 (million)
% 1.49/0.61 % (2018)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.61 % (2018)------------------------------
% 1.49/0.62 % (2032)lrs+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:fsr=off:spb=non_intro:i=41:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/41Mi)
% 1.49/0.62 % Exception at run slice level
% 1.49/0.62 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 1.99/0.63 % (2029)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.99/0.63 % (2029)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.63 % (2029)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.99/0.63 % (2029)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.99/0.63 % (2029)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.99/0.63
% 1.99/0.63 % (2029)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 1.99/0.63 % (2029)Time elapsed: 0.027 s
% 1.99/0.63 % (2029)Instructions burned: 71 (million)
% 1.99/0.63 % (2029)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.63 % (2029)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.63 % (2033)lrs+1004_1:1_chr=on:prag=on:i=6:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/6Mi)
% 1.99/0.63 % (2034)dis+10_1:1_avsq=on:cnfonf=off:e2e=on:nm=32:i=150:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/150Mi)
% 1.99/0.63 % (2033)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.99/0.63 % (2033)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.63 % (2033)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.99/0.63 % (2033)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.99/0.63 % (2033)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.99/0.63
% 1.99/0.63 % (2033)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.99/0.63 % (2033)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 1.99/0.63 % (2033)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 1.99/0.63 % (2033)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.63 % (2033)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.63 % (2027)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.99/0.63 % (2027)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.63 % (2027)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.99/0.63 % (2027)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.99/0.63 % (2027)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.99/0.63
% 1.99/0.63 % (2027)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 1.99/0.63 % (2027)Time elapsed: 0.038 s
% 1.99/0.63 % (2027)Instructions burned: 98 (million)
% 1.99/0.63 % (2027)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.63 % (2027)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.64 % (2035)ott+1010_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:sd=7:ss=axioms:st=1.5:i=343:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/343Mi)
% 1.99/0.64 % (2030)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.99/0.64 % (2030)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.64 % (2030)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.99/0.64 % (2030)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.99/0.64 % (2030)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.99/0.64
% 1.99/0.64 % (2030)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 1.99/0.64 % (2030)Time elapsed: 0.033 s
% 1.99/0.64 % (2030)Instructions burned: 85 (million)
% 1.99/0.64 % (2030)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.64 % (2030)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.64 % (2037)dis+10_1:1_au=on:c=on:e2e=on:fsr=off:sos=all:sp=const_frequency:ss=axioms:i=253:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/253Mi)
% 1.99/0.65 % (2037)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.99/0.65 % (2037)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.65 % (2037)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 1.99/0.65 % (2037)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.99/0.65
% 1.99/0.65
% 1.99/0.65 % (2037)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 1.99/0.65 % (2037)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.99/0.65 % (2037)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 1.99/0.65 % (2037)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.65 % (2037)------------------------------
% 1.99/0.65 % (2038)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:cnfonf=off:sd=1:sgt=16:ss=axioms:i=140:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/140Mi)
% 1.99/0.65 % (2036)ott+1010_1:4_cbe=off:chr=on:hfsq=on:hfsqr=1,16:hud=3:sac=on:sp=unary_frequency:ss=axioms:st=5.0:tnu=2:i=109:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/109Mi)
% 1.99/0.66 % (2039)dis+1010_16:1_acc=model:au=on:avsq=on:cond=fast:plsq=on:plsqc=2:plsqr=9267,262144:i=614:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2997ds/614Mi)
% 2.22/0.69 % (2034)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.22/0.69 % (2034)------------------------------
% 2.22/0.69 % (2034)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.22/0.69 % (2034)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.22/0.69 % (2034)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.22/0.69
% 2.22/0.69 % (2034)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 2.22/0.69 % (2034)Time elapsed: 0.055 s
% 2.22/0.69 % (2034)Instructions burned: 150 (million)
% 2.22/0.69 % (2034)------------------------------
% 2.22/0.69 % (2034)------------------------------
% 2.22/0.69 % (2040)lrs+1002_1:1_e2e=on:fde=unused:fe=axiom:prag=on:sd=1:sos=on:ss=axioms:st=2.0:i=202:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/202Mi)
% 2.22/0.70 % (2040)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.22/0.70 % (2040)------------------------------
% 2.22/0.70 % (2040)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.22/0.70 % (2040)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 2.22/0.70
% 2.22/0.70
% 2.22/0.70 % (2040)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 2.22/0.70 % (2040)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 2.22/0.70 % (2040)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 2.22/0.70 % (2040)------------------------------
% 2.22/0.70 % (2040)------------------------------
% 2.22/0.70 % (2038)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.22/0.70 % (2038)------------------------------
% 2.22/0.70 % (2038)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.22/0.70 % (2038)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.22/0.70 % (2038)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.22/0.70
% 2.22/0.70 % (2038)Memory used [KB]: 6268
% 2.22/0.70 % (2038)Time elapsed: 0.057 s
% 2.22/0.70 % (2038)Instructions burned: 140 (million)
% 2.22/0.70 % (2038)------------------------------
% 2.22/0.70 % (2038)------------------------------
% 2.22/0.71 % (2041)dis+1002_1:1_au=on:cs=on:ins=3:kws=inv_frequency:nwc=10.0:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=339:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/339Mi)
% 2.22/0.71 % (2036)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.22/0.71 % (2036)------------------------------
% 2.22/0.71 % (2036)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.22/0.71 % (2036)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.22/0.71 % (2036)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.22/0.71
% 2.22/0.71 % (2036)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 2.22/0.71 % (2036)Time elapsed: 0.063 s
% 2.22/0.71 % (2036)Instructions burned: 109 (million)
% 2.22/0.71 % (2036)------------------------------
% 2.22/0.71 % (2036)------------------------------
% 2.22/0.72 % (2043)dis+2_1:1_cha=on:hud=7:nwc=3.0:prag=on:tnu=2:i=134:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/134Mi)
% 2.22/0.72 % (2042)dis+10_1:1_anc=none:cnfonf=lazy_gen:fd=preordered:fe=off:hud=10:ins=3:ixr=off:nwc=5.0:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:sp=const_frequency:uhcvi=on:i=283:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/283Mi)
% 2.22/0.73 % Exception at run slice level
% 2.22/0.73 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 2.58/0.74 % (2044)dis+1010_1:64_cnfonf=lazy_simp:fd=off:i=298:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/298Mi)
% 2.58/0.74 % Exception at run slice level
% 2.58/0.74 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 2.58/0.75 % (2035)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.58/0.75 % (2035)------------------------------
% 2.58/0.75 % (2035)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.58/0.75 % (2035)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.58/0.75 % (2035)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.58/0.75
% 2.58/0.75 % (2035)Memory used [KB]: 6652
% 2.58/0.75 % (2035)Time elapsed: 0.114 s
% 2.58/0.75 % (2035)Instructions burned: 343 (million)
% 2.58/0.75 % (2035)------------------------------
% 2.58/0.75 % (2035)------------------------------
% 2.58/0.76 % (2045)lrs+2_1:8_erd=off:plsq=on:plsqr=32,1:sos=on:i=192:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/192Mi)
% 2.58/0.76 % (2046)lrs+10_1:1_bd=off:hud=1:nm=0:prag=on:sd=2:sgt=32:sos=all:ss=axioms:i=258:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/258Mi)
% 2.58/0.77 % (1994)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.58/0.77 % (1994)------------------------------
% 2.58/0.77 % (1994)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.58/0.77 % (1994)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.58/0.77 % (1994)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.58/0.77
% 2.78/0.77 % (1994)Memory used [KB]: 7291
% 2.78/0.77 % (1994)Time elapsed: 0.335 s
% 2.78/0.77 % (1994)Instructions burned: 710 (million)
% 2.78/0.77 % (1994)------------------------------
% 2.78/0.77 % (1994)------------------------------
% 2.78/0.77 % (2043)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.78/0.77 % (2043)------------------------------
% 2.78/0.77 % (2043)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.78/0.77 % (2043)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.78/0.77 % (2043)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.78/0.77
% 2.78/0.77 % (2043)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 2.78/0.77 % (2043)Time elapsed: 0.076 s
% 2.78/0.77 % (2043)Instructions burned: 134 (million)
% 2.78/0.77 % (2043)------------------------------
% 2.78/0.77 % (2043)------------------------------
% 2.78/0.78 % (2047)lrs+1002_1:1024_au=on:cond=fast:ntd=on:piset=and:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=183491,1048576:sac=on:tgt=ground:i=90:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/90Mi)
% 2.78/0.78 % (2048)dis+1004_16:1_avsq=on:avsqr=1,16:cnfonf=lazy_gen:cs=on:fe=off:tgt=ground:tnu=1:i=231:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/231Mi)
% 2.78/0.78 % Exception at run slice level
% 2.78/0.78 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 2.78/0.79 % (2049)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:s2a=on:sgt=32:slsq=on:slsqc=1:slsql=off:ss=axioms:i=458:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/458Mi)
% 2.78/0.80 % (2003)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.78/0.80 % (2003)------------------------------
% 2.78/0.80 % (2003)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.78/0.80 % (2003)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.78/0.80 % (2003)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.78/0.80
% 2.78/0.80 % (2003)Memory used [KB]: 7675
% 2.78/0.80 % (2003)Time elapsed: 0.353 s
% 2.78/0.80 % (2003)Instructions burned: 879 (million)
% 2.78/0.80 % (2003)------------------------------
% 2.78/0.80 % (2003)------------------------------
% 2.78/0.81 % (2050)lrs+1010_1:16_add=large:amm=off:anc=all_dependent:chr=on:fd=off:ins=2:sp=const_max:tnu=5:uhcvi=on:i=31:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/31Mi)
% 2.78/0.81 % (2047)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.78/0.81 % (2047)------------------------------
% 2.78/0.81 % (2047)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.78/0.81 % (2047)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.78/0.81 % (2047)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.78/0.81
% 2.78/0.81 % (2047)Memory used [KB]: 6012
% 2.78/0.81 % (2047)Time elapsed: 0.033 s
% 2.78/0.81 % (2047)Instructions burned: 91 (million)
% 2.78/0.81 % (2047)------------------------------
% 2.78/0.81 % (2047)------------------------------
% 2.78/0.82 % (2051)lrs+10_1:1_cnfonf=lazy_gen:kws=inv_precedence:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:sp=weighted_frequency:ss=axioms:i=297:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/297Mi)
% 2.78/0.82 % Exception at run slice level
% 2.78/0.82 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 2.78/0.82 % (2050)Instruction limit reached!
% 2.78/0.82 % (2050)------------------------------
% 2.78/0.82 % (2050)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.78/0.82 % (2050)Termination reason: Unknown
% 2.78/0.82 % (2050)Termination phase: Saturation
% 2.78/0.82
% 2.78/0.82 % (2050)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 2.78/0.82 % (2050)Time elapsed: 0.014 s
% 2.78/0.82 % (2050)Instructions burned: 31 (million)
% 2.78/0.82 % (2050)------------------------------
% 2.78/0.82 % (2050)------------------------------
% 2.97/0.82 % (2041)First to succeed.
% 2.97/0.83 % (2052)dis+2_1:4_amm=off:au=on:cbe=off:cnfonf=lazy_gen:hfaw=0:hfsq=on:hfsql=off:plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=35,4:sac=on:i=987:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/987Mi)
% 2.97/0.83 % Exception at run slice level
% 2.97/0.83 User error: Vampire does not support full TH1. This benchmark is either outside of the TH1 fragment, or outside of the fragment supported by Vampire
% 2.97/0.83 % (2058)lrs+10_1:1024_avsq=on:avsqc=4:avsqr=584411,1048576:bd=off:bet=on:br=off:chr=on:fsd=on:fsdmm=1:hud=10:nm=0:ntd=on:nwc=9.0:piset=or:plsq=on:plsqc=2:plsql=on:plsqr=852219,1048576:rawr=on:sp=const_frequency:spb=units:i=182:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/182Mi)
% 2.97/0.83 % (2041)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 2.97/0.83 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.97/0.83 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 2.97/0.83 thf(type_def_6, type, tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption: ($tType) > $tType).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(type_def_7, type, sK0: $tType).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(type_def_8, type, sK1: $tType).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(type_def_9, type, sK2: $tType).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_0, type, tyop_2Emin_2Ebool: $tType).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_1, type, tyop_2Emin_2Efun: ($tType * $tType) > $tType).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_2, type, tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption: ($tType) > $tType).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_3, type, c_2Ebool_2E_21: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > $o)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_4, type, c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C: $o > $o > $o).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_5, type, c_2Emin_2E_3D: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0 > X0 > $o)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_6, type, c_2Emin_2E_3D_3D_3E: $o > $o > $o).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_7, type, c_2Ebool_2E_3F: !>[X0: $tType]:((X0 > $o) > $o)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_8, type, c_2Ebool_2ECOND: !>[X0: $tType]:($o > X0 > X0 > X0)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_10, type, c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME: !>[X0: $tType]:(tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 > $o)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_11, type, c_2Eoption_2ENONE: !>[X0: $tType]:(tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_12, type, c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2: !>[X0: $tType, X1: $tType, X2: $tType]:((X1 > X2 > X0) > tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1 > tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2 > tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_13, type, c_2Eoption_2ESOME: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0 > tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_15, type, c_2Eoption_2ETHE: !>[X0: $tType]:(tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 > X0)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_16, type, c_2Ebool_2E_5C_2F: $o > $o > $o).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_17, type, c_2Ebool_2E_7E: $o > $o).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_22, type, sK3: sK2).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_23, type, sK4: sK1).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_24, type, sK5: sK1 > sK2 > sK0).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_25, type, sP6: tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ sK0 > $o).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_26, type, sP7: tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ sK0 > $o).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_27, type, sP8: tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ sK0 > $o).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_28, type, sP9: tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ sK0 > $o).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(func_def_30, type, ph11: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1118,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 $false),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f212,f229,f230,f234,f331,f340,f341,f342,f344,f347,f363,f365,f369,f492,f964,f1072,f1075,f1079,f1082,f1100,f1106,f1117])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1117,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ~spl10_28),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f1116])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1116,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 $false | ~spl10_28),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f1109])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1109,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = $true) | ~spl10_28),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(superposition,[],[f431,f91])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f91,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : X0] : (($true = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X0 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ X1)))) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f78,f83])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f83,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 (c_2Ebool_2ET = $true)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f36])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f36,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 (c_2Ebool_2ET = $true)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f35])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f35,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 c_2Ebool_2ET),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(rectify,[],[f8])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f8,axiom,(
% 2.97/0.83 c_2Ebool_2ET),
% 2.97/0.83 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f78,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : X0] : ((c_2Ebool_2ET = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X0 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ X1)))) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f42,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $tType] : (! [X1 : X0] : (c_2Ebool_2ET = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X0 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ X1))) & (c_2Ebool_2EF = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X0 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0)))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(rectify,[],[f13])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f13,axiom,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $tType] : ((c_2Ebool_2EF = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X0 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0)) & ! [X8 : X0] : (c_2Ebool_2ET = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X0 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ X8))))),
% 2.97/0.83 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME__DEF)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f431,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4))) | ~spl10_28),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f429])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f429,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_28 <=> ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4)))),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_28])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1106,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_29 | spl10_28 | ~spl10_5 | ~spl10_10 | ~spl10_19),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f1105,f268,f232,f210,f429,f433])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f433,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_29 <=> ($false = (sP7 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0))),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_29])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f210,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_5 <=> ! [X0 : $tType,X2 : X0,X1 : X0] : ((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ X0 @ $false @ X1 @ X2) = X2)),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_5])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f232,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_10 <=> ! [X0 : $tType] : ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X0 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0) = $false)),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_10])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f268,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_19 <=> ! [X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $false @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $true) | ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4)))),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_19])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1105,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4))) | ($false = (sP7 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_10 | ~spl10_19)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f1104])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1104,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4))) | ($false = (sP7 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | ($false = $true) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_10 | ~spl10_19)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f943,f233])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f233,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType] : (((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X0 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0) = $false)) ) | ~spl10_10),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f232])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f943,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4))) | ($false = (sP7 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK2 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK2) = $true) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_19)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(superposition,[],[f93,f804])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f804,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : ((c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5)) | ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $true)) ) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_19)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f269,f211])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f211,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X2 : X0,X1 : X0] : (((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ X0 @ $false @ X1 @ X2) = X2)) ) | ~spl10_5),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f210])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f269,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $false @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0))) ) | ~spl10_19),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f268])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f93,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (sP7 @ (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK2)))),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(inequality_splitting_name_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP7])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1100,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ~spl10_37),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f1099])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1099,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 $false | ~spl10_37),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f1092])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1092,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = $true) | ~spl10_37),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(superposition,[],[f890,f91])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f890,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK2 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3)) = $false) | ~spl10_37),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f888])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f888,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_37 <=> ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK2 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3)) = $false)),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_37])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1082,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_37 | spl10_38 | ~spl10_5 | ~spl10_10 | ~spl10_23),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f1081,f288,f232,f210,f892,f888])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f892,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_38 <=> ($false = (sP8 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0))),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_38])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f288,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_23 <=> ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $false) | ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $false @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0)))),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_23])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1081,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (sP8 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK2 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3)) = $false) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_10 | ~spl10_23)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f1080])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1080,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = $true) | ($false = (sP8 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK2 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3)) = $false) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_10 | ~spl10_23)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f954,f233])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f954,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (sP8 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK1 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK1) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK2 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3)) = $false) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_23)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(superposition,[],[f94,f867])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f867,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : ((c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $false) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) = $true)) ) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_23)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f289,f211])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f289,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $false @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $false) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) = $true)) ) | ~spl10_23),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f288])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f94,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (sP8 @ (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3))))),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(inequality_splitting_name_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP8])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1079,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ~spl10_7 | ~spl10_38),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f1078])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1078,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 $false | (~spl10_7 | ~spl10_38)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f1077])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1077,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = $true) | (~spl10_7 | ~spl10_38)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f220,f894])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f894,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (sP8 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | ~spl10_38),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f892])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f220,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($true = (sP8 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | ~spl10_7),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f218])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f218,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_7 <=> ($true = (sP8 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0))),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_7])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1075,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ~spl10_8 | ~spl10_29),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f1074])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1074,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 $false | (~spl10_8 | ~spl10_29)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f1073])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1073,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = $true) | (~spl10_8 | ~spl10_29)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f224,f435])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f435,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (sP7 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | ~spl10_29),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f433])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f224,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((sP7 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0) = $true) | ~spl10_8),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f222])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f222,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_8 <=> ((sP7 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0) = $true)),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_8])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1072,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ~spl10_9 | ~spl10_13),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f1071])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1071,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 $false | (~spl10_9 | ~spl10_13)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f1070])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1070,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = $true) | (~spl10_9 | ~spl10_13)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f1069,f92])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f92,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (sP6 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK0 @ (sK5 @ sK4 @ sK3))))),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(inequality_splitting_name_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP6])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1069,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($true = (sP6 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK0 @ (sK5 @ sK4 @ sK3)))) | (~spl10_9 | ~spl10_13)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f1068,f79])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f79,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : X0] : (((c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X0 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ X1)) = X1)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f43,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : X0] : ((c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X0 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ X1)) = X1)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(rectify,[],[f14])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f14,axiom,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $tType,X8 : X0] : ((c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X0 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ X8)) = X8)),
% 2.97/0.83 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Eoption_2ETHE__DEF)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1068,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((sP6 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK0 @ (sK5 @ sK4 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ sK2 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3))))) = $true) | (~spl10_9 | ~spl10_13)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f1067])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1067,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = $true) | ((sP6 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK0 @ (sK5 @ sK4 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ sK2 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3))))) = $true) | (~spl10_9 | ~spl10_13)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f1064,f91])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1064,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK2 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3)) = $false) | ((sP6 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK0 @ (sK5 @ sK4 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ sK2 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3))))) = $true) | (~spl10_9 | ~spl10_13)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(superposition,[],[f228,f382])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f382,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X3 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X1 : X0,X4 : X0 > X3 > X2,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X3] : (((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X2 @ X0 @ X3 @ X4 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ X1) @ X5) = (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ (X4 @ X1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X3 @ X5)))) | ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X3 @ X5))) ) | ~spl10_13),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f381])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f381,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X3 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X1 : X0,X4 : X0 > X3 > X2,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X3] : (($false = $true) | ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X3 @ X5)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X2 @ X0 @ X3 @ X4 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ X1) @ X5) = (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ (X4 @ X1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X3 @ X5))))) ) | ~spl10_13),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f380,f91])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f380,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X3 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X1 : X0,X4 : X0 > X3 > X2,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X3] : (($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X0 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ X1))) | ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X3 @ X5)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X2 @ X0 @ X3 @ X4 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ X1) @ X5) = (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ (X4 @ X1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X3 @ X5))))) ) | ~spl10_13),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f374,f88])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f88,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X2 : X0,X1 : X0] : (((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ X0 @ $true @ X1 @ X2) = X1)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f73,f83])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f73,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X2 : X0,X1 : X0] : (((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ X0 @ c_2Ebool_2ET @ X1 @ X2) = X1)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f44,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : X0,X2 : X0] : (((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ X0 @ c_2Ebool_2ET @ X1 @ X2) = X1) & ((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ X0 @ c_2Ebool_2EF @ X1 @ X2) = X2))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(rectify,[],[f11])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f11,axiom,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $tType,X9 : X0,X10 : X0] : (((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ X0 @ c_2Ebool_2EF @ X9 @ X10) = X10) & ((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ X0 @ c_2Ebool_2ET @ X9 @ X10) = X9))),
% 2.97/0.83 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebool_2ECOND__CLAUSES)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f374,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X3 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X1 : X0,X4 : X0 > X3 > X2,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X3] : (((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X2 @ X0 @ X3 @ X4 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ X1) @ X5) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2 @ $true @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ (X4 @ X1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X3 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X2)) | ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X3 @ X5)) | ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X0 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ X1)))) ) | ~spl10_13),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(superposition,[],[f245,f79])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f245,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $true @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0) = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5)) | ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $false)) ) | ~spl10_13),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f244])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f244,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_13 <=> ! [X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $true @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0) = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $false) | ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4)))),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_13])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f228,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((sP6 @ (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3))) = $true) | ~spl10_9),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f226])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f226,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_9 <=> ((sP6 @ (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3))) = $true)),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_9])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f964,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ~spl10_5 | ~spl10_6 | ~spl10_10 | ~spl10_27),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f963])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f963,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 $false | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_6 | ~spl10_10 | ~spl10_27)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f962])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f962,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = $true) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_6 | ~spl10_10 | ~spl10_27)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f216,f961])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f961,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (sP9 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_10 | ~spl10_27)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f960])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f960,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = $true) | ($false = (sP9 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_10 | ~spl10_27)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f959,f233])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f959,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK2 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK2) = $true) | ($false = (sP9 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_10 | ~spl10_27)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f958])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f958,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = $true) | ($false = (sP9 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK2 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK2) = $true) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_10 | ~spl10_27)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f955,f233])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f955,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (sP9 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK1 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK1) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ sK2 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK2) = $true) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_27)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(superposition,[],[f95,f926])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f926,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : ((c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $true)) ) | (~spl10_5 | ~spl10_27)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f305,f211])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f305,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $false @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0))) ) | ~spl10_27),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f304])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f304,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_27 <=> ! [X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $false @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0)))),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_27])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f95,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = (sP9 @ (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK1 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK2)))),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(inequality_splitting_name_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP9])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f216,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((sP9 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0) = $true) | ~spl10_6),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f214])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f214,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_6 <=> ((sP9 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0) = $true)),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_6])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f492,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ~spl10_2),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f491])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f491,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 $false | ~spl10_2),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f463])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f463,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = $true) | ~spl10_2),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(superposition,[],[f95,f199])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f199,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $o] : (($true = X0)) ) | ~spl10_2),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f198])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f198,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_2 <=> ! [X0 : $o] : ($true = X0)),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_2])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f369,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ~spl10_22),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f368])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f368,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 $false | ~spl10_22),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f366])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f366,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($true != $true) | ($false = $true) | ~spl10_22),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(superposition,[],[f82,f286])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f286,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $false @ $true) = $true) | ~spl10_22),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f284])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f284,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_22 <=> ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $false @ $true) = $true)),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_22])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f82,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $o] : (($true != (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ X0 @ X1)) | ($true = X0)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f53,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $o] : (((($true = X0) & ($true = X1)) | ($true != (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ X0 @ X1))) & (($true = (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ X0 @ X1)) | ($true != X0) | ($true != X1)))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(flattening,[],[f52])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f52,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $o] : (((($true = X0) & ($true = X1)) | ($true != (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ X0 @ X1))) & (($true = (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ X0 @ X1)) | (($true != X0) | ($true != X1))))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f34])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f34,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $o] : ((($true = X0) & ($true = X1)) <=> ($true = (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f33])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f33,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $o] : ((X0 & X1) <=> (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ X0 @ X1))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(rectify,[],[f1])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f1,axiom,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X3 : $o,X4 : $o] : ((X3 & X4) <=> (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ X3 @ X4))),
% 2.97/0.83 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',logicdef_2E_2F_5C)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f365,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ~spl10_18),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f364])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f364,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 $false | ~spl10_18),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f360])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f360,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($true != $true) | ($false = $true) | ~spl10_18),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(superposition,[],[f81,f266])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f266,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $true @ $false) = $true) | ~spl10_18),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f264])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f264,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_18 <=> ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $true @ $false) = $true)),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_18])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f81,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $o] : (($true != (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ X0 @ X1)) | ($true = X1)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f363,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ~spl10_26),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f362])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f362,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 $false | ~spl10_26),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f358])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f358,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = $true) | ($true != $true) | ~spl10_26),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(superposition,[],[f81,f302])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f302,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $false @ $false) = $true) | ~spl10_26),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f300])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f300,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_26 <=> ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $false @ $false) = $true)),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_26])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f347,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ~spl10_12 | ~spl10_15),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f346])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f346,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 $false | (~spl10_12 | ~spl10_15)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f345])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f345,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($false = $true) | (~spl10_12 | ~spl10_15)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f253,f242])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f242,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $true @ $true) = $false) | ~spl10_12),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f240])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f240,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_12 <=> ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $true @ $true) = $false)),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_12])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f253,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $true @ $true) = $true) | ~spl10_15),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f251])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f251,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_15 <=> ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $true @ $true) = $true)),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_15])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f344,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_15),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f110,f251])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f110,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $true @ $true) = $true)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(equality_resolution,[],[f109])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f109,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $o] : (($true = (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $true @ X1)) | ($true != X1)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(equality_resolution,[],[f80])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f80,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $o,X1 : $o] : (($true = (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ X0 @ X1)) | ($true != X0) | ($true != X1)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f53])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f342,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_26 | spl10_27),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f122,f304,f300])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f122,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $false @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0)) | ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $false @ $false) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) = $true)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cases_simplifying,[],[f120])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f120,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $false @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0)) | ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) @ $false) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $true)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cases_simplifying,[],[f116])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f116,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5)) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $false @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0))) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cases_simplifying,[],[f71])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f71,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5)) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0) = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5))) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f41,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : ((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5)) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0) = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(rectify,[],[f15])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f15,axiom,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X5 : X1 > X2 > X0,X6 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X12 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5 @ X6 @ X12) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X6) @ (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X12)) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X6) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X12))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0))),
% 2.97/0.83 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2__DEF)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f341,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_19 | spl10_18),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f121,f264,f268])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f121,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $false @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0)) | ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $true @ $false) = $true) | ($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4))) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cases_simplifying,[],[f120])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f340,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_22 | spl10_23),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f124,f288,f284])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f124,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $false @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $false) | ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $false @ $true) = $true)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cases_simplifying,[],[f119])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f119,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) @ $true) = $true) | ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5) = (c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $false @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $false)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cases_simplifying,[],[f116])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f331,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_13 | spl10_12),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f135,f240,f244])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f135,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (($false = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $false) | ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ $true @ $true) = $false) | ((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $true @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0) = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5))) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cases_simplifying,[],[f131])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f131,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $true @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0) = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5) = $false) | ((c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) @ $true) = $false)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cases_simplifying,[],[f115])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f115,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X1 : $tType,X0 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X1 > X2 > X0,X4 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X1,X5 : tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X2] : (((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ tyop_2Eoption_2Eoption @ X0 @ $true @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X3 @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ETHE @ X2 @ X5))) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0) = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5)) | ($false = (c_2Ebool_2E_2F_5C @ (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X2 @ X5)))) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cases_simplifying,[],[f71])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f234,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_1 | spl10_10),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f189,f232,f194])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f194,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_1 <=> (c_2Ebool_2EF = $true)),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl10_1])])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f189,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType] : (((c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X0 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0) = $false) | (c_2Ebool_2EF = $true)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f77])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f77,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType] : ((c_2Ebool_2EF = (c_2Eoption_2EIS__SOME @ X0 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0))) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f230,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_2 | ~spl10_1),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f63,f194,f198])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f63,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $o] : ((c_2Ebool_2EF != $true) | ($true = X0)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f47])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f47,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $o] : ((($true = X0) | ($true != X0) | (c_2Ebool_2ET != $true)) & ((($true = X0) & (c_2Ebool_2ET = $true)) | ($true != X0)) & ((c_2Ebool_2EF = $true) | (c_2Ebool_2EF != $true) | ($true != X0)) & (((c_2Ebool_2EF = $true) & ($true = X0)) | (c_2Ebool_2EF != $true)) & (((c_2Ebool_2ET = $true) & ($true = X0)) | ($true != X0)) & (($true = X0) | (c_2Ebool_2ET != $true) | ($true != X0)) & (((c_2Ebool_2EF = $true) & ($true = X0)) | (c_2Ebool_2EF != $true)) & ((c_2Ebool_2EF = $true) | (c_2Ebool_2EF != $true) | ($true != X0)) & (($true = X0) | ($true != X0) | ($true != X0)) & ((($true = X0) & ($true = X0)) | ($true != X0)))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(flattening,[],[f46])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f46,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $o] : (((($true = X0) | (($true != X0) | (c_2Ebool_2ET != $true))) & ((($true = X0) & (c_2Ebool_2ET = $true)) | ($true != X0))) & (((c_2Ebool_2EF = $true) | ((c_2Ebool_2EF != $true) | ($true != X0))) & (((c_2Ebool_2EF = $true) & ($true = X0)) | (c_2Ebool_2EF != $true))) & ((((c_2Ebool_2ET = $true) & ($true = X0)) | ($true != X0)) & (($true = X0) | ((c_2Ebool_2ET != $true) | ($true != X0)))) & ((((c_2Ebool_2EF = $true) & ($true = X0)) | (c_2Ebool_2EF != $true)) & ((c_2Ebool_2EF = $true) | ((c_2Ebool_2EF != $true) | ($true != X0)))) & ((($true = X0) | (($true != X0) | ($true != X0))) & ((($true = X0) & ($true = X0)) | ($true != X0))))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f38])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f38,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $o] : ((($true = X0) <=> (($true = X0) & (c_2Ebool_2ET = $true))) & ((c_2Ebool_2EF = $true) <=> ((c_2Ebool_2EF = $true) & ($true = X0))) & (((c_2Ebool_2ET = $true) & ($true = X0)) <=> ($true = X0)) & (((c_2Ebool_2EF = $true) & ($true = X0)) <=> (c_2Ebool_2EF = $true)) & (($true = X0) <=> (($true = X0) & ($true = X0))))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(fool_elimination,[],[f37])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f37,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $o] : ((X0 <=> (X0 & X0)) & (c_2Ebool_2EF <=> (X0 & c_2Ebool_2EF)) & (X0 <=> (X0 & c_2Ebool_2ET)) & (c_2Ebool_2EF <=> (X0 & c_2Ebool_2EF)) & (X0 <=> (c_2Ebool_2ET & X0)))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(rectify,[],[f9])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f9,axiom,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X7 : $o] : ((X7 <=> (X7 & X7)) & (c_2Ebool_2EF <=> (X7 & c_2Ebool_2EF)) & (X7 <=> (X7 & c_2Ebool_2ET)) & (c_2Ebool_2EF <=> (X7 & c_2Ebool_2EF)) & (X7 <=> (c_2Ebool_2ET & X7)))),
% 2.97/0.83 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Ebool_2EAND__CLAUSES)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f229,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_6 | spl10_7 | spl10_8 | spl10_9),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f96,f226,f222,f218,f214])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f96,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ($true = (sP8 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0)) | ((sP6 @ (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3))) = $true) | ((sP9 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0) = $true) | ((sP7 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0) = $true)),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(inequality_splitting,[],[f76,f95,f94,f93,f92])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f76,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK0 @ (sK5 @ sK4 @ sK3)) != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3))) | (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0 != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK2)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3)) != c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0) | (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0 != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK1 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK2))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f51])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f51,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ((c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK0 @ (sK5 @ sK4 @ sK3)) != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3))) | (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0 != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK2)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3)) != c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0) | (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0 != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK1 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK2))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2,sK3,sK4,sK5])],[f45,f50])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f50,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ? [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X2,X4 : X1,X5 : X1 > X2 > X0] : (((c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X5 @ X4 @ X3)) != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ X3))) | (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X1 @ X4) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X2)) | (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ X3))) | (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X1 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X2))) => (((c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK0 @ (sK5 @ sK4 @ sK3)) != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3))) | (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0 != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK1 @ sK4) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK2)) | ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ sK2 @ sK3)) != c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0) | (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK0 != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ sK0 @ sK1 @ sK2 @ sK5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK1 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ sK2)))),
% 2.97/0.83 introduced(choice_axiom,[])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f45,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ? [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X2,X4 : X1,X5 : X1 > X2 > X0] : (((c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X5 @ X4 @ X3)) != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ X3))) | (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X1 @ X4) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X2)) | (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ X3))) | (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 != (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X1 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X2)))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f39])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f39,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ~! [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X3 : X2,X4 : X1,X5 : X1 > X2 > X0] : ((c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ X3))) & (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X1 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X2)) & ((c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X5 @ X4 @ X3)) = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X1 @ X4) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ X3))) & (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X1 @ X4) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X2)))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(rectify,[],[f17])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f17,negated_conjecture,(
% 2.97/0.83 ~! [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X13 : X2,X6 : X1,X14 : X1 > X2 > X0] : ((c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X14 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X1 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X2)) & ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X14 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X1 @ X6) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ X13)) = (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X14 @ X6 @ X13))) & (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X14 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X1 @ X6) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X2)) & (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X14 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ X13))))),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f16])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f16,conjecture,(
% 2.97/0.83 ! [X0 : $tType,X1 : $tType,X2 : $tType,X13 : X2,X6 : X1,X14 : X1 > X2 > X0] : ((c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X14 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X1 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X2)) & ((c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X14 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X1 @ X6) @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ X13)) = (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X0 @ (X14 @ X6 @ X13))) & (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X14 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X1 @ X6) @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X2)) & (c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X0 = (c_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2 @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X14 @ c_2Eoption_2ENONE @ X1 @ (c_2Eoption_2ESOME @ X2 @ X13))))),
% 2.97/0.83 file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm_2Eoption_2EOPTION__MAP2__THM)).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f212,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 spl10_5 | spl10_1),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f192,f194,f210])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f192,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X2 : X0,X1 : X0] : (((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ X0 @ $false @ X1 @ X2) = X2) | (c_2Ebool_2EF = $true)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cases_simplifying,[],[f72])).
% 2.97/0.83 thf(f72,plain,(
% 2.97/0.83 ( ! [X0 : $tType,X2 : X0,X1 : X0] : (((c_2Ebool_2ECOND @ X0 @ c_2Ebool_2EF @ X1 @ X2) = X2)) )),
% 2.97/0.83 inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44])).
% 2.97/0.83 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 2.97/0.83 % (2041)------------------------------
% 2.97/0.83 % (2041)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 2.97/0.83 % (2041)Termination reason: Refutation
% 2.97/0.83
% 2.97/0.83 % (2041)Memory used [KB]: 6268
% 2.97/0.83 % (2041)Time elapsed: 0.121 s
% 2.97/0.83 % (2041)Instructions burned: 329 (million)
% 2.97/0.83 % (2041)------------------------------
% 2.97/0.83 % (2041)------------------------------
% 2.97/0.83 % (1973)Success in time 0.454 s
% 2.97/0.83 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------